HIST 100: Engineering The Past

  • Home
  • Syllabus
  • Schedule
  • Blog

The Prownian Method: Kyle Mitsunaga

January 20, 2016 by kylemitsunaga 4 Comments

export-2016-01-20-19-28-54

Prownian Method: Kyle Mitsunaga

Step 1 Description: This object is about 5 to 6 inches long, there appears to be a charging input built into this object. I also notice that this object has an oddly shaped head with razors on it. Looking closer to the razor it seems as if they are very sharp. The object at room temperature is not hot or cold to the touch. The object looks as if there has been some technological thought put into it. This object looks sturdy and durable that will last you a while if taken good care of.

Step 2 Deduction: The user of this object seems as if it would be a male or female. It would be safe to say that this object may be use by males that are older than 15 years old, with little leeway. Since there is a built in charger with a cord I could say that this person could use it if they were to travel. Also professionals could use this object.

Step 3 Speculation: Maybe the person or male that is using this object is trying to clean up his look. Going hand in hand with that maybe this person is looking to just trim a beard. Maybe the person that is using this object is a professional and needs this object to be able to carry out his or hers performance. The person that owns this electric razor understands how to use it, and know how to take care of the blades such as oiling it down from time to time.

 

Questions about the electrical razor:

  1. Does the buyer of this object need instructions on how to operate it?
  2. Are younger kids safe to use it? Is there any danger hazards relating to the product?
  3. Are there different techniques how to use this product?
  4. How does one electrical razor differ from competitors?
  5. Does the shape make a difference for what you are using for?

 

 

Bibliography

“Effectiveness of Razors Put to the Test.” Dermatology Nursing 14, no. 6 (December 2002): 413. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed January 20, 2016).

 

In this peer reviewed article it tackles the scientific side of razors whether it be electrical or not. We get an understanding what razors are better for your skin and which one dermatologist suggest.

 

 

“The Razor Blade: History’s Cutting Edge : Culture: Scientists Know ThatAncient Man Shaved. But the Razor Was an Undocumented Implement until 1290.” Los Angeles Times. 1992. Accessed January 20, 2016. http://articles.latimes.com/1992-07-26/news/vw-4938_1_razor-blade-edge.

 

This article the author focuses on the history of the razor going all the way back to when they first tested it out. Furthermore we learn about Gillette the razor company and how they went from selling 50 razors to 300,000 razors.

 

Additional Information:

 

In the web based article found in the Los Angeles Times the author makes it clear the history of the razor. The razor industry stated in the article “was thriving by the 18th century.” I connected this with the prownian method just by how quickly this industry because a vital part of our culture. I believe it is safe to say that most males and females that are the appropriate age would have had an experience using a razor whether it is electric or not. It is material culture since we use them frequently and most people today own one.

 

My peer-reviewed article took a different approach that made it a little harder to connect it to the prownian method. Like I said it took on the science on which razor is better for your skin. As we see new technology we are soon going to see new ideas with razors in the future I’m sure. In a since this razor phenomena is something that is so simple but yet such a huge part of our culture. People would look different today if we didn’t have razors; therefore it’s something that is connected to us, and our culture as a whole.

 

 

Filed Under: 02.1 Prownian Analysis, Group 1, Student Contributions

1.2 Bridges by Pete Cook

January 18, 2016 by petewcook 1 Comment

Hey y’all! The purpose of this post is to:

  • briefly compares and contrasts the two bridges’ designs, environs, and how people choose to frame and depict the bridges in their photos;
  • hypothesizes what the differences in the bridges reveal about the times in which they were built;
  • hypothesizes what the persistence of these bridges (each has been renovated and reinforced, but not redesigned or replaced) suggests about the beliefs and/or values of New York City and San Francisco.

The Golden Gate Bridge and Brooklyn Bridge are both a form of suspension bridge. The Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, CA is  a suspension, truss arch/causeway bridge that consists of the weight of the roadway being hung by two cables passing through the two main towers that are fixed in concrete at each end. There are 27,572 strands of wire in each cable and 80,000 miles of wire in the main cables. There is approximately 1.2 million rivets in the bridge. The Brooklyn Bridge in N.Y.C., NY uses a hybrid cable-stayed suspension bridge design. The materials used in the towers are Rosendale cement, limestone, and granite. There are numerous passageways and compartments built into the bridge’s anchorages.

The environs around the Golden Gate Bridge are the San Francisco Bay, San Francisco, and Marin County. The strait is 6,700 feet long, has strong, swirling tides and currents, with a water depth of 372 feet in the middle of the channel, frequently strong winds, and terrible blinding fog. The environs around the Brooklyn Bridge are the East River, N.Y.C. (Civic Center, Manhattan – Dumbo/ Brooklyn Heights, Brooklyn). The bridge was built 6 times stronger than designer Washington Roebling thought it should be due to the possibility of wind stressing the cables, towers, etc. (this was before the use of wind tunnels to test the impact and force wind can have on a bridge).

People choose to frame and depict the Golden Gate Bridge in their photos as a prominent American landmark, with its international orange that compliments the backdrop of the surrounding bay and beautiful display of lights. It has been used in books, movies, and video games. They also choose to depict the Brooklyn Bridge in photos such as wide shots of the NYC skyline for t.v. shows and movies, and also in books and articles.

The differences in the bridges most likely reveal the newer technology, design, and architectural/structural thinking of the times in which they were built. Neither of these bridges were tested for wind impact because they were made before the time of the test, but they were built to be better than what the designers thought they should be, so that they would withstand more impact than anyone had ever thought of before. These bridges pioneered the way for newer, bigger, and better bridges around the world, because they were the best at their time.

The persistence of these bridges suggests that the beliefs and values of San Francisco and New York City are to preserve these national iconic American landmarks with as much originality as possible. These two cities were the foundation of very strong, possibly ahead of their time, suspension bridges that were the biggest and best in the world at the time. The two cities want to preserve the original looks, structure, and materials as much as possible but also it is okay if they need to use different materials in order to achieve that goal, because with newer technology, we now have better means of keeping these bridges up to spec.

Pete Cook

Filed Under: 01.2 Bridges, Group 2

Greatest Bridges of America: The Brooklyn and The Golden Gate

January 17, 2016 by Wankun Leave a Comment

The Brooklyn Bridge and The Golden Gate Bridge are two of America’s most famous, most beautiful, and most recognized bridges. Both bridges provide important connections between major cities and have similar structural design. Many consider them as the wonders of the late 18th to early 19th centuries due to their advanced architectural and engineering features. Located on the opposite sides of the country, there are some key similarities and differences between the two bridges.

THE BROOKLYN BRIDGE

The Design

The Brooklyn Bridge was completed in 1883, making it one of the oldest bridges in America. It hybrids the cable-stayed design with the suspension design. At the time, the Brooklyn Bridge was the longest bridge in the world, with the total length of 50% longer than any other bridge. This revealed to me that, at the time, America probably had a more advanced technological knowledge than others, as well as a more successful economy. The materials used for the towers consist of limestone, granite, and natural cement. There was no aerodynamics analysis performed on the Brooklyn Bridge. However, the chief designer, John Augustus Roebling, had made the bridge and its supporting mechanisms six times as strong as it needed to be. Having lasted for more than 130 years, this bridge shows the high level of workmanship during the design process.

From The Photographs

The first thing that come to mind when seeing a photograph of the Brooklyn Bridge is how antique it appears, especially when buildings of the city beyond look very modern. I believe that this carry a very strong message of how valuable this bridge is to New York City. No matter how much things have changed, the iconic bridge is still standing strong. It also is rare that a photograph of the bridge does not include the landscape of the city in the background. The most popular angles and compositions used when photographing the bridge are those that was taken from the Manhattan side, and those that focus primarily on the suspension cables of the bridge. From this, I can think of a few messages that these photographers are trying to tell us. One, they wanted to show what this bridge connects–Brooklyn and Manhattan–and how great the two places are. Two, they wanted to focus on the beauty of the engineering of this bridge. Constructing something this big is not an easy task today, and it was nearly an impossible task back in the late 1800’s. In the end, some groups of people somehow worked together and created this beautiful piece of architecture.

The Persistence

In 2010, a full renovation project of the Brooklyn Bridge was initiated by the New York City’s Transportation Department due to the poor safety rating from the inspection, although it was not in a critically dangerous state. From this event, I believe that the values and beliefs of the New York City consists of safety, honor, and dedication. The department spent $508 million on the renovation project. That is a significant amount of money, and it could have been spent on replacing or redesigning the bridge. Instead, they chose to preserve one of the most important icons of New York, to honor the tremendous amount of hard work and dedication that was put into the bridge, and to also maintain the high level of safety for its citizen.

THE GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE

The Design

Fifty four years younger than the Brooklyn Bridge, the Golden Gate Bridge opened in 1937. It is a cable-suspension bridge. The chief motivation that initiated the construction of this bridge was the lack of permanent link among the communities of the San Francisco Bay, and the lower-than-average growth rate of the city itself. Some of the challenges the design team faced include the length of the bridge, harsh weather conditions, and the depth of the water. It utilizes thin and flexible roadways that allow more deformation without causing failure. I believe that this is why the towers of the Golden Gate appear much slimmer than those of the Brooklyn Bridge.

From The Photographs

The Golden Gate Bridge is possibly the world’s most photographed bridge. Its color certainly contributes to the overall beauty of the architecture. The bridge is such an icon that when most people think of San Francisco, the first thing they think of is rather the Golden Gate, and not the city itself. As mentioned previously, compared to the Brooklyn Bridge, the Golden Gate Bridge’s towers look significantly slimmer and much more modern than those of the Brooklyn Bridge. This quickly shows how rapidly technology can change in just 50 years. Another key observation from many photographs is the weather–cloudy and foggy–which describes the overall climate conditions of the area. Unlike the Brooklyn Bridge, there isn’t as much little cables to sustain the bridge. From this, it is possible that the overall design of the Golden Gate is more efficient.

The Persistence

The Golden Gate Bridge never went under an extensive renovation like the Brooklyn Bridge, as it was never needed. To me, this simply means that the bridge is very well designed and has been able to withstand almost 80 years of abuse so far. It also means that the material choice of the design was probably better than the Brooklyn Bridge–steel vs. concrete. However, some other smaller renovation projects such as repainting the main cables have been performed. Although it may sound like a simple task, the process include scraping off the old paint without dropping it all over the ocean below, apply corrosion prevention coatings, and finally apply the paint. The length of all the cables in this bridge adds up to about 80,000 miles. In my opinion, that is nowhere near a simple task. Just like New York City, San Francisco values this piece of architecture as highly and is willing to preserve it for years to come.

Filed Under: 01.2 Bridges, Group 5

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • …
  • 94
  • Next Page »

Students

Log in here.

Groups

Student Contributions

From the Professor

Copyright © 2025 · Minimum Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in