HIST 100: Engineering The Past

  • Home
  • Syllabus
  • Schedule
  • Blog

iPhone

January 23, 2016 by taylorarchuleta Leave a Comment

Step 1, Description: The item is about 6 inches from top to bottom and is nearly a quarter inch thick. It weighs less than a pound and fits comfortably in the palm of my hand. It is metal on the back, in a shiny gold color, with small buttons on the sides. The front is encased in white metal, with what looks to be a screen in the middle of the front. The screen is 5.5 inches across. There are small holes on the bottom of the item, indicative of a speaker. The gold back piece feels slick; the front black screen feels waxy. The object seems to conduct heat when being held, however is cool to the touch when left sitting out for a moment.

 

Step 2, Induction: Based solely on the slick gold piece of metal covering the back of the item, I would assume this object is meant to be held when used. Judging by the hand-held size of the item, I presume is meant for personal technological use. It seems to be coated in such a way to prevent sliding out of a grip. The screen on the item indicates that it is used to view various things, such as videos, playlists, or emails. I presume the speaker on the bottom is used to hear music or videos when they are playing off the object.

 

Step 3, Speculation: After examination, I think this item is used as a personal computer of sorts. The speakers would be very effective in viewing videos, or listening to music. It would be easy to tote, as the design is small enough to fit in pockets, purses, or a small compartment in a vehicle. I speculate the item is used for ease of access to internet, or connection to friends and family. It appears to be an ease-of-access object for all users, with various technological needs.

apple_iphone_61

Apple introduces iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus smartphones. (n.d.). Retrieved January 23, 2016, from http://www.kitguru.net/apple/anton-shilov/apple-introduces-iphone-6-iphone-6-plus-smartphones/

Filed Under: 02.1 Prownian Analysis, Group 3

Bridges

January 17, 2016 by Daniel Zmuda Leave a Comment

The Brooklyn Bride and the Golden Gate Bridge have been iconic since the moment they were built. Both of these bridges have stood the test of time, without having to be completely renovated. In the photographs on Flickr, the Golden Gate Bridge is photographed at a distance, where you are able to admire it’s color and length. The Brooklyn Bridge on the other hand has many different up close and personal pictures. We are able to see the bridge up close, they make for pretty remarkable pictures with all of the different cables crossing overhead. Also the pictures of the Golden Gate Bride, we are never really looking at the cities they are connecting, we can only just see the ocean in the background. With the Brooklyn Bridge, the bridge appears to be the centerpiece connecting the two important cities.

Since the Brooklyn Bridge was built first and about 50 years earlier than the Golden Gate Bridge, it wasn’t as scientifically advanced. The Golden Gate bridge is able to sway slightly in the wind, and hold much more weight at the middle causing it to flex. Another example of how science had influenced the construction, was the safety netting. Joseph Strauss invented safety netting to catch the men if they fell while working on the bridge. Of the eleven that died while working on the bridge, ten of them died when they got too close to use the safety nets. Science has played a huge role in the development of both bridges.

I think that since both bridges haven’t completely been renovated, it shows that both of the cities value the structures. The city of San Francisco wasn’t connected to the mainland and had a population growth less than the national average, but I assume it skyrocketed with the completion of the bridge, bringing much more wealth along with it. The Brooklyn Bridge was completed during a time when ferry travel was dangerous and through treacherous water. I believe both cities want to honor the hard work that all designers and engineers have put into both bridges, it would be a shame for them to dismiss such hard work and accomplishment.

Filed Under: 01.2 Bridges, Group 3

01.2 Bridges

January 17, 2016 by taylorarchuleta 1 Comment

The Brooklyn Bridge and the Golden Gate Bridge are two of the most iconic bridges in the United States. They both located on opposite sides of the country from each. These two bridges share quite a few similarities, but they are also very different. They are both cable suspension bridges with overall design very similar. Both of these bridges were built during two different time periods so there is going to be some major differences.

The Brooklyn Bridge was built in the late 1800’s and it kind of give you the attitude of the gothic era. The bricks and structures used are just a dark in color. The arch ways are what really set it apart from different bridges. They are large opening in which vehicles travel through but the design and texture of the arch ways is what set it apart from other bridges. When you picture the bridge across the Hudson River, those brick arch ways is always the image that sticks in my head. I believe those arch ways is what makes the bridge so iconic and standout.

The Golden Gate Bridge was built in the 1930’s which about 40 years later from when the Brooklyn Bridge was built. A lot had changed within those years. Technology advanced largely and structural designs were completely different. Looking at the Golden Gate Bridge I just see how extravagant it truly is. I believe when the architect designed this bridge they wanted it to be tall bright and iconic. That is exactly what this bridge is. When you think of San Francisco you think of the Bridge. One of the things that sets the Golden Gate Bridge apart in my mind is the color. Its a bright redish orange that you can see for miles. The beams that hold the bridge are a lot taller than those of the Brooklyn Bridge. I feel as though they wanted them to be extremely tall and show our architecture abilities. In the photo I was looking at, it feels as though the photographer wanted to capture the beautiful color of the bridge and just pure imagine of the bridge itself.

They have remodeled both bridges numerous times, but not once have they ever changed the overall appearance. These bridges are so iconic to their cities that they are something you just can’t alter. They are the hope and symbol of the cities. I strongly believe both of these cities value their history and value their iconic symbols that have helped shape their cities.

Filed Under: 01.2 Bridges, Group 3

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • Next Page »

Students

Log in here.

Groups

Student Contributions

From the Professor

Copyright © 2026 · Minimum Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in